What am I taking for granted?
A decision takes shape from information, interpretations and expectations. Distinguishing these elements is a useful exercise for leaders. What facts do I know? What explanations am I assigning to those facts? What future conditions am I imagining?
My interest in philosophy leads me to make room for the quality of questions and the examination of beliefs. At work, this outlook can become a concrete practice: making an assumption explicit, asking what evidence supports it and checking whether alternative interpretations exist.
A long-held shared belief may remain valid, or it may need to be updated. Familiarity with a subject makes discussion quicker, but it can also leave some premises outside the conversation. This is why I find it useful to revisit periodically the meaning of the words we use and the criteria by which we interpret results.
Which priority am I putting into practice?
Priorities can be seen in how time, attention and resources are allocated. If we say an objective is important, we can ask which decisions are advancing it. Who is working on it? Which activities have been revised? Which obstacles require management’s intervention?
These questions also help us recognize tensions. An organization may want greater speed while introducing steps that slow every approval. It may ask for autonomy while leaving the boundaries within which to exercise it unclear. Making these conditions visible allows us to address them more precisely.
Leaders must also be able to question their own contribution to a problem. Some behaviors may be a reasonable response to the signals an organization sends. Before attributing them solely to individuals, it is worth observing the expectations, constraints and consequences that guide their work.
Who will bear the consequences of the choice?
Decisions have effects spread over time and across different people and groups. Asking who will receive the benefits, who will have to implement them and who will face the difficulties makes our reasoning more complete. Some effects may be immediate; others will emerge later.
I consider this attention part of managerial responsibility. Not every need can receive the same response, but each must be able to enter our field of view. A choice becomes clearer when we can explain which consequences we have considered and what reviews will be necessary.
Continuing to ask questions takes discipline and a willingness to engage in discussion. It allows us to maintain an active relationship with what we know and to recognize when a decision deserves to be reconsidered. It is a practice I want to place at the center of my vision of leadership.
Pietro Zappaterreno
Entrepreneur and creator of the ECP Method.CEO and co-founder of Datasec.
