Attending to what comes before the result

As a musician and singer, I consider preparation an essential part of the relationship with what we want to express. Familiarity with a piece allows us to recognize its passages, refine our interpretation and pay closer attention to what is happening in the ensemble.

This perspective also interests me at work. A meeting, presentation or important decision depends on prior activities: understanding the subject, selecting information, identifying open questions and knowing the contribution expected of each person. The visible result often occupies less space than the work that makes it possible.

Preparing also means recognizing what we do not yet understand. Knowing where further investigation is needed allows us to make better requests and involve the appropriate expertise. Preparation thus supports a clearer understanding of our own limitations.

Leaving room to notice what is happening

An organization encounters changing conditions, unexpected questions and new information. Preparation also helps us recognize these changes and assess their consequences. The clearer the objectives and constraints, the more the discussion can focus on what requires a choice.

In the relationship between music and leadership, I find it useful to consider the attention we have available. Knowing our own contribution allows us to observe the work of others and the signals coming from the whole more closely. A musical group and a business have different purposes. In both experiences, I am interested in how personal preparation brings greater awareness to our contribution to the shared work.

At work, making time for joint preparation helps reveal dependencies, differing expectations and unresolved issues. It allows us to use a meeting to discuss the questions that truly require the presence of those involved.

Valuing review

Preparation continues after an activity as well. Reviewing what happened helps distinguish the parts that went well, the difficulties we anticipated and those that surprised the group. Discussion becomes useful when it describes observable factors and identifies a practical change.

From a leadership perspective, this means making room for improvement without turning every review into an overall judgment of people. An unclear step may call for a better-defined responsibility, different information or shared preparation.

In music and work, I am interested in this shared responsibility. Attention to our own contribution, listening to the whole and a willingness to revisit the work are themes worth considering when leading an organization too.

Pietro Zappaterreno

Entrepreneur and creator of the ECP Method.
CEO and co-founder of Datasec.